Skip to main content
CloudCertPrep
SOA-C03Domain 1: Monitoring, Logging, Analysis, Remediation, and Performance OptimizationMonitoring & RemediationmediumSingle choice

Compliance requires retaining application logs for 7 years, but CloudWatch Logs costs too much at that horizon. What's the cost-efficient archive pattern?

A.Keep logs in CloudWatch with 7-year retention

7 years in CloudWatch is the expensive answer.

B.Export logs to S3 with lifecycle policies to Glacier Deep Archive

S3 + lifecycle to Deep Archive. Correct.

C.Reduce log verbosity to save cost

Verbosity changes what you keep — not where archives live.

D.Use metric filters instead of storage

Metric filters extract metrics — they don't store logs.

Why this answer

Export logs to S3 (subscription filters to Kinesis Firehose or scheduled export) and lifecycle them to Glacier Deep Archive for pennies/GB — the standard long-retention cost pattern. CloudWatch retention is priced for operational use, not archival.

Correct answer: B · Last reviewed 2026-11-05

Official AWS references

Practice this interactively

Answer without seeing the solution first in the Monitoring & Remediation practice session.

Practice Monitoring & Remediation